In Re Kellogg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• extending deadline where “there [were] complexities” and “many parties and issues [were] affected”
• “Furthermore while there is little authority dealing with the ‘for cause’ requirement we believe extension should be granted liberally absent a clear showing of bad faith….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• F & M Marquette National Bank v. Keith R. Richards
  Eighth Circuit· 1985-12-27· cited 54×
• In Re Leary
  D. Massachusetts· 1995-08-24· cited 16×
• Goralnick v. Bromberg (In Re Goralnick)
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-07-24· cited 14×
• In Re Desiderio
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-06-12· cited 14×
• In Re Mendelsohn
  S.D. New York· 1996-11-04· cited 14×
• Matter of James
  N.D. Georgia· 1995-10-02· cited 14×
• In Re Dekelata
  E.D. Michigan· 1993-01-07· cited 13×
• In Re Boltz-Rubinstein
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-06-17· cited 11×
• Matter of Amezaga
  D. Puerto Rico· 1996-01-26· cited 7×
• In Re Stonham
  D. Colorado· 2004-11-29· cited 7×
• In Re Knobel
  D. Colorado· 1985-10-28· cited 7×
• In Re Hall
  D. Utah· 1985-05-31· cited 4×
• Citizens First National Bank of New Jersey v. Kirkpatrick (In Re Kirkpatrick)
  S.D. New York· 1990-10-19· cited 4×
• In re Sheppard
  Sixth Circuit· 2015-07-09· cited 4×
• General Electric Credit Corp. v. Watts (In Re Watts)
  N.D. Alabama· 1986-04-14· cited 3×
• In Re Blatz
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1986-02-28· cited 3×
• In re: Michael Sheppard v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2015-07-09