In Re KD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a third party involved in a civil proceeding based on the same facts as the juvenile case qualified as an interested party under section 405/l-8(c) of the Act and was therefore entitled to inspect the records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. J.R.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-08-19· cited 13×
• Brokaw v. Brokaw
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-03-30· cited 1×
• In Re JR
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-08-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kraft, Inc. v. Edgar
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-09-26· cited 391×
• Bonaguro v. the County Officers Electoral Board
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1994-03-18· cited 316×
• Wilcoxen v. Paige
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-09-16· cited 45×
• Poelker v. Warrensburg-Latham Community Unit School District No. 11
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-30· cited 35×
• In re J.S.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-10-12· cited 31×
• In Re a Minor
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1992-06-25· cited 24×
• People v. McClendon
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-09-03· cited 23×
• People v. Puente
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-07-22· cited 21×
• B.M. v. Department of Professional Regulation
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-05-23· cited 1×