Michigan Court of Appeals· 4/29/1997
In Re KB
Citations
- 562 N.W.2d 208
- 221 Mich. App. 414
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]ith respect to the governmental interests involved, the government has a significant interest in the protection of the individual and the general public.”
- “[W]ith respect to the governmental interests involved, the government has a significant interest in the protection of the individual and the general public.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McDonald, Bandstra, Bosman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. Portus (In Re Portus)Michigan Court of Appeals· 2018-07-24· cited 87×
- In Re AMBMichigan Court of Appeals· 2002-01-25· cited 83×
- in Re Charles Frederick PortusMichigan Court of Appeals· 2018-07-24
- in the Matter of Ann Marie MoriconiMichigan Court of Appeals· 2021-06-10
- In Re Chadd LondowskiMichigan Court of Appeals· 2022-02-17
- Arthur Duckett v. Mary C SolkyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2022-06-02
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- United States v. EllerbeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-08-24· cited 26×
- Application of TrueIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-05-26· cited 24×
- Dobrzenski v. DobrzenskiMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-02-06· cited 22×
- Dietrich v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-12-20· cited 17×
- Lewis v. DonahueW.D. Oklahoma· 1977-09-19· cited 11×
- People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1990-10-02· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.