Skip to main content
· 8/24/2007

In Re Kaplan Higher Education Corp.

Citations

  • 235 S.W.3d 206
  • 50 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1058
  • 2007 Tex. LEXIS 707
  • 2007 WL 2404836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the agents of a signatory may sometimes invoke an arbitration clause even if they themselves are nonsignatories and a claimant is not suing on the contract.”
  • holding claim of “unclean hands” that went to contract as a whole rather than arbitration clause was question for arbitrators
  • holding claim of ″unclean hands″ that went to contract as a whole rather than arbitration clause was question for arbitrators
  • finding that it would be “impractical” to require that every corporate agent sign or be listed in every contract in order to circumvent the avoidance of arbitration provisions by artful pleadings
  • “We emphasize again today that arbitration clauses do not automatically cover all corporate agents or affiliates.”
  • “Claims of fraudulent 9 Counts 2 and 6 also include allegations sounding in fraudulent inducement. (See, e.g., Am. Compl. ¶¶ 103-10, 164-66.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.