In Re Kapcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Const 1963, art 6, § 30 contemplates that the JTC and this Court will make individualized determinations on the entire factual context
• noting that Const 1963, art 6, § 30 contemplates that the JTC and this Court will make individualized determinations on the entire factual context
• once the JTC makes a recommendation, “the Supreme Court ‘may censure, suspend with or without salary, retire or remove’ a judge on grounds specified in the Constitution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Disbarment of Gillard
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-08-04· cited 66×
• In the Matter of Mikesell
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1976-05-27· cited 50×
• State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Lewis
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1973-07-24· cited 25×
• In Re Servaas
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2009-07-31· cited 22×
• State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Del Rio
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1979-11-26· cited 16×
• Gantz v. City of Detroit
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1974-08-02· cited 13×
• Peterson v. Knutson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-08-08· cited 12×
• In re Adams
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2013-06-19· cited 9×
• State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Ryman
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1975-05-27· cited 3×
• in Re Honorable Deborah Ross Adams
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2013-06-19
• in Re Hon Lisa O Gorcyca
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2017-07-28

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Stice
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1960-01-23· cited 10×

Other cases named In Re Kapcia

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• In re Kapcia
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1976-05-27