In Re Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that § 455 requires “timely action” and that “[m]otions to recuse should not be viewed as .. . additional arrow[s] in the quiver of advocates in the face of [anticipated] adverse rulings.”
• stating that § 455 requires “timely action” and that “[m]otions to recuse should not be viewed as . . . additional arrow[s] in the quiver of advocates in the face of [anticipated] adverse rulings.”
• finding no abuse of discretion in denial of recusal where, inter alia, during pendency of litigation judge’s daughter accepted defendant’s offer of employment as associate attorney
• finding a ten-month delay from the initial awareness of a potential conflict rendered the motion untimely
• stating a party must “meet the substantial showing necessary to establish a 3 The Court issues a separate order (Doc. #23
• noting that a judge’s prior position as a partner of a law firm involved in the lawsuit did not raise a question of bias because “the intervening 15 years [were] sufficient to erase any appearance of partiality stemming from [the judge’s] prior firm membership.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).