In Re Kandu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no fundamental right to same-sex marriage based on the Supreme Court's cautionary statements that courts should \exercise the utmost care\ in establishing a new fundamental liberty interest
• “[T]here are no grounds to conclude objectively that same-sex marriages are deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition.”
• “The test to evaluate whether a facially gender-neutral statute discriminates on the basis of sex is whether the law can be traced to a discriminatory purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).