Skip to main content
· 10/20/1964

In re Kaminetsky

Citations

  • 234 F. Supp. 991
  • 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because [plaintiff’s] need for [the] evidence is the only Esposito factor weighing in his favor, the Court finds that preclusion is appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruchhausen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.