Third Circuit· 7/16/2012
In Re K-Dur Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 686 F.3d 197
- 2012 WL 2877662
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[N]othing in the rule of reason test that we adopt here limits the ability of the parties to reach settlements based on a negotiated entry date for marketing of the generic drug . . . .”
- overcharge establishes injury and the amount of the overcharge constitutes damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter, Stengel, Vanaskie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- F.T.C. v. Actavis, Inc.Supreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 237×
- King Drug Co of Florence Inc v. Smithkline Beecham CorporationThird Circuit· 2015-06-26· cited 50×
- In re Aggrenox Antitrust LitigationD. Connecticut· 2015-03-23· cited 46×
- In re NexiumD. Massachusetts· 2013-09-11· cited 43×
- In re: Lamictal Direct Purchas v.Third Circuit· 2020-04-22· cited 37×
- American Sales Co. v. Warner Chilcott Co.First Circuit· 2016-02-22· cited 36×
- In re Cipro Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court· 2015-05-07· cited 30×
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.N.D. California· 2014-11-17· cited 29×
- Yarger v. Ing Bank, FSBD. Delaware· 2012-08-27· cited 21×
- In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-09-23· cited 19×
- In re Skelaxin (Metaxalone) Antitrust LitigationE.D. Tennessee· 2013-06-10· cited 18×
- Jimmy Glen Riemer v. the State of Texas and Jerry Patterson, as Commissioner of the General Land Office of the State of TexasTexas Supreme Court· 2013-02-22· cited 17×
- In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2013-11-14· cited 15×
- In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2013-12-11· cited 13×
- Apotex, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-05-19· cited 11×
- In re Lamictal Direct Purchaser Antitrust LitigationD. New Jersey· 2014-01-24· cited 10×
- In re Lipitor Antitrust LitigationD. New Jersey· 2014-09-12· cited 10×
- In re Loestrin 24 Fe Antitrust LitigationD. Rhode Island· 2014-09-04· cited 9×
- In re Flonase Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-06-14· cited 8×
- In re Domestic Drywall Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-08-23· cited 7×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-03-10· cited 1,658×
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court· 1984-06-19· cited 1,375×
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 921×
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 694×
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court· 1957-01-14· cited 664×
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 612×
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Third Circuit· 1977-07-21· cited 553×
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court· 1969-06-16· cited 551×
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 549×
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationFederal Circuit· 1983-07-25· cited 538×
- Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical SocietySupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 523×
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-05-17· cited 519×
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLPSupreme Court· 2004-01-13· cited 412×
- Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court· 1942-12-07· cited 386×
- United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court· 1942-05-11· cited 305×
- Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-09-22· cited 273×
- Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2003-11-14· cited 261×
- Hassine v. JeffesThird Circuit· 1988-04-29· cited 196×
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. GormullySupreme Court· 1892-04-04· cited 145×
- Joblove v. Barr Labs. Inc.Second Circuit· 2005-11-02· cited 133×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.