In re K. C. R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing trial court's decision that interview statement was made freely, voluntarily, and intelligently
• harmless constitutional error to admit statements made after invocation of right to silence when subsequent statements merely reiterated Cline’s earlier stoiy
• suspect’s invocation must be unambiguous, such that a reasonable police officer under the circumstances would understand the statement as an assertion of a Miranda right
• suspect's invocation must be unambiguous, such that a reasonable police officer under 21 the circumstances would understand the statement as an assertion of a Miranda right
• reviewing trial court’s conclusion statement freely, voluntarily, and intelligently made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).