In Re Justin T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning courts not to use the fact that the Department has restricted the relationship of a parent and a child as evidence that termination is in the child's best interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Thomas D.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-08-04· cited 66×
• In Re Michaela C.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2002-10-22· cited 36×
• Mariello v. Giguere
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-11-14· cited 33×
• In Re Angel B.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-05-30· cited 18×
• In Re Serena C.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-12-15· cited 17×
• In Re Breauna N.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-12-20· cited 8×
• Miller v. Nichols
  D. Maine· 2009-01-09· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santosky v. Kramer
  Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
• In Re Elijah R.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-02-04· cited 24×
• In Re Misty Lee H.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1987-08-06· cited 21×
• In Re Hope H.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-05-06· cited 15×
• In Re Jeffrey E.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1989-04-25· cited 15×
• In Re David H.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-03-01· cited 7×
• In Re Christina H.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-12-30· cited 5×

Other cases named In Re Justin T.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• In Re Justin T.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-08-27· cited 4×
• In re Justin T.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-08-27