In re Judicial Ethics Op. 2018-10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that contracting officer found offeror non-responsible and “did not feel that sufficient time had elapsed for the Government to determine the [remedial] measure’s effectiveness”
• stating, without citation, that “[a]ffiliates must have been involved in or affected -by the contractor’s wrongdoing to be named in the debarment”
• stating, without citation, that “[a]ffiliates must have been involved in or affected by the contractor’s wrongdoing to be named in the debarment”
• “Contracting officers are responsible for ensuring that government contracting programs run effectively.”
• post-award of long-term charter of petroleum tankers for the Defense Energy Support Center
• describing M & J’s remaining endeavors as “some residual trade”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).