In re J.R.; In re E.R.; In re A.R.; In re D.R

Syllabus

The respondents, K.M. and E.R., Sr., appealed from decrees of the Family Court, terminating their parental rights to their four eldest children, J.R., E.R., A.R., and D.R. The respondents raised several issues on appeal, arguing that the trial justice erred in terminating their parental rights and in admitting as a full exhibit the report of the guardian ad litem assigned to represent the interests of the children in this case. Holding that the trial justice did not err in terminating the respondents' parental rights and that any error in admitting as a full exhibit the report was harmless, the Supreme Court affirmed the decrees of the Family Court.