In re: JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA v.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the Bank Secrecy Act’s “specific list of subject entities and individuals trumps any suggestion of a broader universe of individuals bound by the prohibition on disclosure . . . That reading also would comport with general agency principles.”
• declining bank’s “invitation to view the ‘privilege’ as extending to any 5 document that might speak to the investigative methods of financial institutions.”
• “District courts have extrapolated from the [SAR] statute and 11 regulations ‘an unqualified discovery and evidentiary privilege that . . . cannot be waived.’” q W (omission in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).