In Re Joseph Vlasek, Debtor-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[The appellant] could have — and should have — appealed and sought stays of any subsequent orders approving the sale of estate assets.”
• \Mt is an age-old principle that in formulating equitable relief a court must consider the effects of the relief on innocent third parties.\
• \Mt is an age-old principle that in formulating equitable relief a court must consider the effects of the relief on innocent third parties.\
• “A court of appeals’ jurisdiction over a district court’s review of a bankruptcy court order can only be based on a proper exercise of the district court’s jurisdiction.” (citation omitted)
• “Thus, ‘this Court and others have repeatedly held that an appeal of a bankruptcy sale is moot if the stay required by § 363(m) is not obtained.’” (quoting In re Sax, 796 F.2d 994, 998 (7th Cir. 1986)); In re River W. Plaza-Chicago, LLC, 664 F.3d 668, 671 (7th Cir. 2011

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).