Skip to main content

In Re Jordan

Citations

  • 913 So. 2d 775
  • 2005 WL 1527693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the language of Rule 3.8(d) was recognizably similar to the prosecutor's duty set forth in Brady and its progeny and that the prosecutor violated the rule by not disclosing Brady material
  • no sanction due to confusion over the meaning of the rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Traylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.