In Re Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Mandamus is ‘generally reserved for questions of unusual importance necessary to the economical and efficient administration of justice . . . .’” (emphasis added) (quoting John B. v. Goetz, 531 F.3d 448, 457 (6th Cir. 2008)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of Iowa
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 4,814×
• Smith v. Barry
  Supreme Court· 1992-01-14· cited 954×
• John B. v. Goetz
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-06-26· cited 144×
• Thomas J. Dillon v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-07-21· cited 36×