In Re Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the fact that respondent took money from his employer and not a client was immaterial because “lawyers are subject to discipline for improper conduct in individual, personal, or business activities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gittens
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-25· cited 36×
• In Re Berg
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-03-06· cited 34×
• In re Mintz
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-02-07· cited 25×
• In Re Marshall
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-11-22· cited 15×
• In Re Bailey
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-10-29· cited 14×
• In Re Arnold
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-10-25· cited 10×
• In Re Ketter
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-11-05· cited 9×
• In re Long
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2022-06-17· cited 9×
• In re Robertson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-10-07· cited 7×
• In Re Coder
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-12-07· cited 5×
• In re Berry
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-07-12· cited 5×
• In Re Farrell
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-04-20· cited 4×
• In re Lockett
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-01-26· cited 3×
• In Re Gershater
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-01-26· cited 2×
• In re Clark
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2022-01-28· cited 2×
• In re Janoski
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2022-09-02· cited 2×
• In re Phillips
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-10-18· cited 2×
• In re Lowry
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2022-12-02· cited 2×
• In re Fulcher
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2024-07-26· cited 2×
• In re Solorio
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2024-12-27· cited 1×