Skip to main content

In Re Jones

Citations

  • 660 A.2d 76
  • 442 Pa. Super. 463
  • 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming order of trial court that part of erroneous distribution be returned to satisfy claims of newly discovered heirs
  • Previous distribution decree in intestate proceeding did not have res judicata effect as to newly discovered heirs petitioning for review of decree; no identity of parties existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Beck, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.