N.D. Ohio· 4/21/1989
In Re Jones
Citations
- 98 B.R. 757
- 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 647
- 1989 WL 43764
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- because debtor was not personally liable for mortgage, mortgagee did not qualify as holder of a “claim”
- debtor’s plan may not provide for the curing of a mortgage default because there exists no creditor-debtor relationship between the mortgagee and the debtor, who is not liable on the mortgage
- debtor may not cure because there is no debtor-creditor relationship
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walter J. Krasniewski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Garcia (In Re Garcia)D. Arizona· 2002-04-22· cited 23×
- Ulster Savings Bank v. Kizelnik (In Re Kizelnik)S.D. New York· 1995-12-14· cited 23×
- Matter of HutchersonN.D. Georgia· 1995-09-22· cited 18×
- In Re RutledgeE.D. New York· 1997-05-15· cited 17×
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Lumpkin (In Re Lumpkin)D. Connecticut· 1992-08-27· cited 16×
- In Re MitchellC.D. Illinois· 1994-03-11· cited 5×
- In Re WrightC.D. Illinois· 1995-06-29· cited 4×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.