District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 5/11/2006
In Re Jones
Citations
- 898 A.2d 916
- 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 211
- 2006 WL 1277771
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “the CPO failed to afford [Mr. Jones] sufficient notice of the manner in which to comport himself upon leaving the well of the courtroom”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferren, Reid, Fisher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-08-02· cited 18×
- In re FergusonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-02-23· cited 6×
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-10-25· cited 3×
- In re Timothy MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-03-10
- In re CurtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-04-28
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-10-17· cited 210×
- Wade v. Kessler InstituteSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-06-13· cited 155×
- Accusoft Corporation, Appellant\\cross-Appellee v. James L. Palo Simon Weiczner Individually and D/B/A Snowbound Software, Appellees\\cross-AppellantsFirst Circuit· 2001-01-19· cited 97×
- Federal Marketing Co. v. Virginia Impression Products Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-05-15· cited 45×
- United States v. Rapone, AnthonyD.C. Circuit· 1997-12-19· cited 39×
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-10-30· cited 21×
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-12-12· cited 19×
- Ba v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-10-31· cited 16×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-05-30· cited 14×
- In Re DixonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-07-15· cited 11×
- Vaas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-06-03· cited 9×
- Jones v. HarknessDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-04-09· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.