Skip to main content
· 8/18/2000

In Re Jonathan Wilson Fillbach

Citations

  • 223 F.3d 1089
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6950
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9201
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 20918
  • 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 160
  • 2000 WL 1166322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a litigant may not avoid a vexatious litigant order by filing suit in a different court
  • holding that a litigant may not avoid a vexatious litigant order by filing suit in a different court
  • explaining that a district court may dismiss an action where a litigant attempts to avoid a vexatious litigant order by filing suit in a different court
  • recognizing district courts’ inherent power to file restrictive pre-filing orders, as well as their discretion to dismiss a complaint made in an attempt to evade such an order
  • affirming dismissal of a bankruptcy petition filed to circumvent a vexatious litigant order entered in bankruptcy court
  • a district court has discretion to dismiss an action for failure to comply with a vexatious litigant pre-filing order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sneed, Kleinfeld, Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.