· 11/29/1989
In Re Joint Eastern And Southern Districts Asbestos Litigation
Citations
- 891 F.2d 31
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- examining the 3 FTCA to determine that the discretionary function exception should be read into the Suits in 4 Admiralty Act, even though that Act “contain[ed] no express exception for discretionary 5 functions”
- \[W]e find the SAA to be subject to the discretionary function exception. This result is compelled by our steadfast refusal to assume powers that are vested in the concurrent branches.\
- “[W]e find the SAA to be subject to the discretionary function exception. This result is compelled by our steadfast refusal to assume powers that are vested in the concurrent branches.”
- “We believe that it is unimportant whether the government actually balanced economic, social, and political concerns in reaching its decision.”
- “We believe that it is unimportant whether the government actually balanced economic, social, and political concerns in reaching its decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.