In Re Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, on balance, debtor’s chapter 13 plan was proposed in good faith
• “neither a good faith belief that the creditor had a right to the property nor good faith reliance on the advice of counsel is relevant”
• “[the court] is sim ply not permitted to equitably enlarge the time period for filing proofs of claim absent facts which place Creditors [sic] within one of the express exceptions of Rule 3002”
• “[the court] is simply not permitted to equitably enlarge the time period for filing proofs of claim absent facts which place Creditors [sic] within one of the express exceptions of Rule 3002”
• “Given the unambiguous language of Rule 9006(b)(3) and controlling case law, this Court concludes it is simply not permitted to equitably enlarge the time period for filing proofs of claim absent facts which place Creditors within one of the express exeep-tions of Rule 3002”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Galmore v. Dykstra (In Re Galmore)
  N.D. Indiana· 2008-07-25· cited 19×
• In Re Daniels
  D. Idaho· 2004-10-27· cited 18×
• In Re Stitt
  D. Idaho· 2008-11-07· cited 12×
• Richardson v. Trustees of Indiana University (In re Richardson)
  S.D. Indiana· 2013-08-21· cited 12×
• In Re Windom
  E.D. Tennessee· 2002-09-27· cited 9×
• In Re Kaskel
  D. Idaho· 2001-10-17· cited 7×
• In Re Stern
  D. Maryland· 2001-08-13· cited 5×
• In re Denby-Peterson
  D. New Jersey· 2017-10-20· cited 5×
• Hardesty v. Chase (In Re Hardesty)
  N.D. Ohio· 2010-12-02· cited 4×
• In Re Hyde
  D. Idaho· 2009-04-21· cited 3×
• In Re Webb
  Sixth Circuit· 2012-04-09· cited 3×
• In Re Bowen
  D. Idaho· 2005-09-27· cited 1×
• In re: MARK E. STUART
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-11-10