In Re Johns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting debtors’ argument that zero payment to unsecureds in a chapter 13 resulting from among other things, debtors’ ability to deduct 401k contributions in a chapter 13, was a special circumstance
• debtors’ inability to fund chapter 13 plan is not an exception to the means test
• the potential payback of zero percent dividend in Chapter 13 is not a special circumstance to rebut the presumption of abuse
• potential payback of 0% to unsecured creditors in Chapter 13 not a “special circumstance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Barraza
  N.D. Texas· 2006-08-01· cited 56×
• In Re Haman
  D. Delaware· 2007-04-20· cited 41×
• In Re Tranmer
  D. Montana· 2006-11-16· cited 38×
• In Re Delbecq
  S.D. Indiana· 2007-04-26· cited 26×
• In Re Cribbs
  S.D. Georgia· 2008-05-01· cited 23×
• In Re Tuss
  D. Montana· 2007-01-05· cited 21×
• In Re Castle
  N.D. Ohio· 2006-09-11· cited 15×
• In Re Littman
  D. Idaho· 2007-07-06· cited 15×
• In Re Tauter
  M.D. Florida· 2009-02-24· cited 13×
• In Re Siler
  W.D. North Carolina· 2010-03-23· cited 13×
• In Re Harmon
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-02-16· cited 9×
• Robbins v. Alther (In re Alther)
  W.D. Virginia· 2015-09-11· cited 8×
• In Re Rieck
  D. Minnesota· 2010-04-16· cited 3×
• In Re Fechter
  D. Montana· 2011-05-19