In re Johnny H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We find no basis for suppression in the fact that there may have been a civilian-arranged single-photo identification, made prior to the police procedure and without any police involvement.”
• “We find no basis for suppression in the fact that there may have been a civilian-arranged single-photo identification, made prior to the police procedure and without any police involvement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Bean v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-03-28· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Danielson
  New York Court of Appeals· 2007-12-13· cited 13,222×
• Perry v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 2012-01-11· cited 846×
• In re Katherine W.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1984-06-29· cited 293×
• People v. Marte
  New York Court of Appeals· 2009-06-11· cited 33×
• In re Jimmy D.
  New York Court of Appeals· 2010-10-26· cited 31×

Other cases named In re Johnny H.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• In re Johnny H.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-11-26