Skip to main content
· 4/1/2024

In Re Johnathan Cooper v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Congress’s specific jurisdictional distinctions elsewhere in the TCPA support the holding that Congress intended state courts to hear private actions
  • we must give 2 effect to all provisions of a statute “so that no part will be inoperative or superfluous, void, or insignificant”
  • “the statute does not appear to reflect an attempt by Congress to occupy this field of interstate communication or to promote national uniformity of regulation.”
  • even if unusual, not unprecedented to limit private enforcement to state court
  • “[F]ederal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.