In Re John Rodgers Burnley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in an appeal from a Rule 60(b) denial, the appellate court may not review the merits of the underlying orderCit may only review the denial of the 60(b) for an abuse of discretion
• concluding post-judgment motion filed outside the period for filing a Rule 59(e) should be considered a Rule 60(b) Motion
• explaining that motion filed beyond time period for a Rule 59(e) Motion constitutes a Rule 60(b) Motion
• concluding post-judgment motion filed outside the period for filing a Rule 59(e) should be considered a Rule 60(b) Motion
• concluding post-judgment motion filed outside the period for filing a Rule 59(e) should be considered a Rule 60(b) Motion
• noting that statutory exceptions to § 2283 “must be narrowly construed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).