Skip to main content
· 1/6/2004

In Re John P. Curtis, James H. Kemp, and Jan-Joost Pabst

Citations

  • 354 F.3d 1347
  • 69 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1274
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 65
  • 2004 WL 26892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declarations were insufficient to overcome the substantial intrinsic evidence in the application and prosecution history
  • inquiry into whether skilled artisan “could not predict the operability in the invention of any species other than the one disclosed”; focus on “unpredict- ability in performance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clevenger, Dyk, Prost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.