In re John F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the definition of “child custody proceeding” includes CINA proceedings and, therefore, “[t]he court was ... required to have jurisdiction over the subject matter under the UCCJEA[.]”
• emphasizing that while the juvenile court’s subject matter jurisdiction may be presumed where it exercises jurisdiction over a child, its authority to act in a CINA proceeding is constrained by its “statutorily enumerated powers”
• “[T]he burden is on the party challenging subject matter jurisdiction to rebut that presumption”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Friedetzky v. Hsia
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-06· cited 8×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-28· cited 5×
• Alford v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-03-02· cited 3×
• In re Ryan W.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-21· cited 2×
• Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-04-28· cited 1×
• IDHW v. John Doe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2021-09-27

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of Assessments
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-09· cited 113×
• In Re Nahif A.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-09-14· cited 20×
• Austin v. Director of Patuxent Institution
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-01-16· cited 20×
• Charley v. Kelley
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1894-02-05· cited 13×