In re J.M.E.
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 47
Syllabus
The juvenile court's decision to grant a children services agency permanent custody of a minor child was supported by clear and convincing evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the agency demonstrated the child had been in the agency's custody for more than 12 months of a consecutive 22-month time period, the child could not be reunified with his mother within a reasonable period of time due to the mother's ongoing drug dependency issues, mental health and behavioral problems, and her failure to complete case plan requirements, and it was in the child's best interest for permanent custody to be granted to the agency.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re K.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 255×
- In re C.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-14· cited 81×
- In re D.K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-30· cited 80×
- In re G.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-16· cited 72×
- In re K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-19· cited 63×
- In re T.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-11· cited 62×
- In re H.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-10· cited 6×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-06· cited 6×
- In re A.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.