In re J.M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court’s findings under § 5540(1) were not based on improper weighing of child’s bond with foster family, but rather on testimony that biological parents were unable to care for child and that foster parents had become child’s psychological parents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re B.S.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-03-28· cited 62×
• In re J.T.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-01-10· cited 53×
• In re T.T.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-02-22· cited 28×
• In re D.B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-12-10· cited 24×
• In re A.S.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-10-20· cited 8×
• In re A.W.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-01-21· cited 7×
• In re S.P.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-09-26· cited 3×
• In Re As
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-10-20· cited 1×
• In Re DB
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-12-10
• In Re JM
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-03-12
• In Re JT
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-01-10
• In Re BS
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-03-28
• In Re AW
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-01-21
• In Re SP
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-09-26
• In re A.C.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-12-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re J.R.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-11-03· cited 64×
• In re H.A.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-01-26· cited 55×
• In re L.A.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-03-30· cited 32×
• In re R.W.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-02-26· cited 11×