Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/21/2025

In re J.M.

Citations

2025 Ohio 1406

Syllabus

The juvenile court's decision to grant permanent custody of the minor child to a children services agency was in the child's best interest and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where Father failed to visit or maintain contact with the child for more than 90 days, failed to maintain sobriety, failed to complete case plan objectives, and failed to demonstrate a commitment to financially supporting the child.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

In re L.D.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-15· cited 3×
In re C.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-02· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Santosky v. Kramer
Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
Eastley v. Volkman
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
In re Z.C.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
In re C.B.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-14· cited 81×
In re D.K.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-30· cited 80×
In re G.F.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-16· cited 72×
In re K.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-19· cited 63×
In re S.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-22· cited 57×
In re D.E.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-20· cited 43×
In re M.A.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-30· cited 35×
In re J.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-30· cited 29×
In re G.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-29· cited 21×
In re I.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-06· cited 19×
In re E.V.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-22· cited 9×
In re H.G.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-13· cited 6×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.