In re J.L.
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3098
Syllabus
Denial of motion to continue Lack of standing to challenge alleged error. It is well settled that an appeal lies only on behalf of an aggrieved party. An appellant may not challenge an alleged error committed against a nonappealing party unless the appealing party can show prejudice from the alleged error. Consequently, Mother may only challenge the denial of Father's motion for continuance if she can show that she has been prejudiced by the alleged error. The record reveals that Mother was represented by counsel, was present for the hearing, and had the opportunity to fully participate in the hearing. Thus, Mother fails to show prejudice. Absent a demonstration of prejudice caused by the alleged error, Mother does not have standing to challenge the denial of Father's motion to continue.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re C.F.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 583×
- In re K.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 255×
- In re HoffmanOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-23· cited 194×
- In re J.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-26· cited 82×
- Love v. TupmanOhio Supreme Court· 1969-07-09· cited 67×
- In re L.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-03· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.