In re J.L.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1142
Syllabus
PERMANENT CUSTODY; REASONABLE EFFORTS; R.C. 2151.419(A)(2)(e); LEGAL CUSTODY. The trial court did not err by awarding permanent custody of Jas.M. and Jax.M. to the agency because the agency was not required to demonstrate that it made reasonable efforts to reunify the family since mother-appellant had her parental rights involuntarily terminated as provide for in R.C. 2415.419(A)(2)(e). It was not plain error for the trial court o grant legal custody of S.L., J.L., and N.L. to legal custodians.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 1,335×
- Schade v. Carnegie Body Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 515×
- In re N.R.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-16· cited 48×
- In re M.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-24· cited 29×
- In re I.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-09· cited 20×
- In re B.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-23· cited 14×
- In re J.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-16· cited 10×
- In re A.V.O.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-10· cited 6×
- In re K.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-02· cited 6×
- In re E.Z.-S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-29· cited 4×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.