In re J.K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the victim’s statements to a medical social worker during an interview in a hospital emergency room were statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment, admissible under ER 803(a)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• D.P. v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-10-31· cited 51×
• State v. Garrett
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-01-23· cited 11×
• M/V La Conte, Inc. v. Leisure
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-08-21· cited 9×
• In Re JK
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-10-27
• Matter of NH
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-01-31

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santosky v. Kramer
  Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
• Alderwood Associates v. Washington Environmental Council
  Washington Supreme Court· 1981-10-15· cited 159×
• Jenkins v. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-01-16· cited 84×
• Moss v. Vadman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-12-18· cited 71×
• In Re Dependency of Penelope B.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-11-14· cited 52×
• General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation Commission
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-09-19· cited 48×
• Chubb v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-14· cited 24×
• Caffrey v. Chem-Ionics Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1966-11-03· cited 10×
• Lehmann v. Board of Trustees of Whitman College
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-03-30· cited 9×