In re Jim Walter Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an otherwise identical slot machine was not a gambling device because there was no evidence of the existence of the prong mechanism or that it was actually being used for gambling
• finding that an otherwise identical slot machine was not a gambling device because there was no evidence of the existence of the prong mechanism or that it was actually being used for gambling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).