Skip to main content

In re J.H.

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 4005

Syllabus

CHILDREN – PERMANENT CUSTODY – BEST INTEREST – R.C. 2151.414: The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by denying mother's motion for a continuance where mother sought to give a relative time to file a custody petition, because no custody petition had been filed, a home study was incomplete, and the relative failed a prior home study for noncompliance. The juvenile court did not err in determining that permanent custody was in the best interest of J.H. where he could not be placed with either of his parents within a reasonable time due to factors in R.C. 2151.414(E), and the court's best-interest analysis was well-supported by the record.

Judges: Crouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.