Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/10/2021
In re J.G.
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1624
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a blended sentence and ordering restitution.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying an abuse of discretion standard to restitution orders on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re A.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-08· cited 10×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-01· cited 4×
- In re K.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-07· cited 1×
- In re L.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-31· cited 1×
- In re J.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-04
- In re R.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-03
- In re T.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-15
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State ex rel. Hansen v. ReedOhio Supreme Court· 1992-05-06· cited 115×
- State v. D.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-01-08· cited 68×
- State v. LeGrantOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-31· cited 35×
- In re T.D.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-31· cited 4×
- Grove City v. SampleOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-15· cited 2×
- In re D.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.