Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/9/2019
In re J.G.
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3620
Syllabus
The juvenile court did not err in granting custody of the child to appellee in the absence of a statement of understanding required by R.C. 2151.353(A)(3) because appellee filed a motion for custody and was not a proposed legal custodian set forth in a motion filed by a party to the action.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.