In re J.F.
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3085
Syllabus
It cannot be determined whether clear and convincing evidence supports the trial court's decision to award permanent custody of the children to the agency because the trial court did not specifically address each of the R.C. 2151.414(D)(1) best-interest factors in its judgment entries or otherwise affirmatively indicate that it considered all of the R.C. 2151.414(D)(1) factors.
Judges: Preston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- In re Adoption of HolcombOhio Supreme Court· 1985-08-07· cited 1,100×
- In Re B.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-16· cited 193×
- In re H.M.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-30· cited 85×
- In re Adoption of LayOhio Supreme Court· 1986-07-16· cited 82×
- In re K.M.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-17· cited 49×
- In re N.R.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-16· cited 48×
- In re A.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-19· cited 43×
- In re C.E.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-11-16· cited 32×
- In re Y.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-12· cited 24×
- In re K.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-13· cited 9×
- In re N.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.