In re J.F.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 3407
Syllabus
Permanent custody R.C. 2151.414 sufficiency of the evidence manifest weight of the evidence two-prong test clear and convincing evidence. The Cuyahoga County Division of Children and Family Services (\CCDCFS\) presented clear and convincing evidence to establish both prongs of the two-part test enumerated in the permanent custody statute. Accordingly, the juvenile court's decision is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Therefore, the trial court did not err when it granted CCDCFS's motion to modify temporary custody to permanent custody.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 4,990×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In re K.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-12· cited 72×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 61×
- In re R.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-20· cited 28×
- In re D.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-28· cited 19×
- In re J.C-A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-19· cited 13×
- In re L.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-13· cited 13×
- In re M.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.