in Re Jermaine Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because Johnson failed to controvert the 26 PSR’s felony classification of his § 245(a)(1) conviction, the district court was entitled to accept that aspect of the PSR as a finding of fact under Rule 32.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).