In Re Jefferson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Strictly prohibiting a modification under these factual circumstances could not have been the intent of Congress, because then both § 502(j) and § 1329 would be rendered meaningless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Coastal Credit, L.L.C. v. Mellors (In Re Mellors)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-07-26· cited 22×
• In re Anderson
  N.D. Mississippi· 2015-10-19· cited 11×
• In Re Ross
  W.D. Missouri· 2007-08-10· cited 10×
• In re Tucker
  N.D. Mississippi· 2013-10-28· cited 10×
• In re Scarver
  M.D. Alabama· 2016-08-24· cited 7×
• In re Fayson
  D. Delaware· 2017-07-13· cited 7×
• In re Moncree
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2014-06-27· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re: Sahnica Denise Nolan, Debtor. Chrysler Financial Corporation v. Sahnica Denise Nolan
  Sixth Circuit· 2000-10-24· cited 113×
• In Re Jock
  M.D. Tennessee· 1989-01-30· cited 68×
• In Re Rimmer
  W.D. Tennessee· 1992-07-24· cited 44×
• In Re Frost
  S.D. Ohio· 1989-02-10· cited 42×
• In Re Zieder
  D. Arizona· 2001-06-04· cited 40×
• In Re Coffman
  N.D. Texas· 2002-01-10· cited 36×
• In Re Banks
  S.D. Mississippi· 1993-11-19· cited 35×
• In Re Anderson
  M.D. Tennessee· 1993-04-13· cited 31×
• In Re Knappen
  D. New Mexico· 2002-01-17· cited 28×
• In Re Hernandez
  S.D. Texas· 2002-08-09· cited 25×
• In Re Barclay
  N.D. Alabama· 2001-08-09· cited 16×
• In Re Jackson
  S.D. Alabama· 2001-03-19· cited 10×