In re Jean

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “this erroneous boilerplate language does not merit remand if the ALJ offers specific reasons to disbelieve the claimant’s testimony”
• “this erroneous boilerplate language does not merit remand if the ALJ offers specific reasons to disbelieve the claimant’s testimony”
• “[r]ead in context, however, this statement does not indicate that the RFC assessment was a basis for a finding of lack of credibility”
• “this erroneous boilerplate language does not merit remand if the ALJ offers specific reasons to disbelieve the claimant’s testimony”
• “this erroneous boilerplate language does not merit remand if the ALJ offers specific reasons to disbelieve the claimant’s testimony”
• “Because the ‘[f]ailure to provide “good reasons” for not crediting the opinion of a claimant’s treating physician is a ground for remand,’ this case must be remanded for that purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).