Skip to main content
· 10/10/2002

In Re J.D. Edwards World Solutions Co.

Citations

  • 87 S.W.3d 546
  • 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 18
  • 2002 Tex. LEXIS 156
  • 2002 WL 31259811

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • compelling arbitration when arbitration agreement applied to claims at issue and there were no defenses to enforcement of the agreement
  • holding fraudulent inducement claims were within scope of arbitration clause
  • involving A the contracting parties = choice of law @
  • “a party seeking to compel arbitration by mandamus must establish . . . that the claim at issue falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement”
  • “Under the TAA, a party is entitled to an interlocutory appeal from an order denying an application to compel arbitration only if it is “made under Section 171.021 [of the TAA] ....”
  • “Under the TAA, a party is entitled to an interlocutory appeal from an order denying an application to compel arbitration only if it is \made under Section 171.021 [of the TAA] . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.