In re J.D.
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1310
Syllabus
INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT — PROBATE COURT — EXPUNGEMENT — LAW OF THE CASE: The probate court properly denied appellant's motion to expunge the records of his involuntary commitment because the involuntary-commitment statute does not authorize the expungement of appellant's involuntary-commitment records and the court of appeals has already determined that the probate court lacked inherent authority to expunge those records.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2000-06-19· cited 633×
- State v. Quarterman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-09-23· cited 582×
- City of Pepper Pike v. DoeOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 88×
- Giancola v. Azem (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-05-03· cited 66×
- In re BurtonOhio Supreme Court· 1984-06-20· cited 61×
- Farmers State Bank v. Sponaugle (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-06-27· cited 31×
- State v. OforiOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-03· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.