In re J.D.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1839
Syllabus
Permanent custody; R.C. 2151.414(E); R.C. 2907.05 and 2919.22(A). Juvenile court's finding that the child had not been in the custody of the agency for 12 months out of the past 22 consecutive months and that the child could not and should not be returned to the custody of the parent was supported by clear and convincing evidence where there was a documented history of substance abuse; appellant was in jail for a crime where the victim was one of the child's siblings; and the crimes were in violation of R.C. 2907.05 and 2919.22(A). Additionally, the juvenile court was not required to extend temporary custody for the full two years, where the record did not support a finding that the parent had made significant progress on the case plan, or that there was reasonable cause to believe that the child would be reunified with the parent within the extension period.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In re C.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-20· cited 36×
- In re R.A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-18· cited 17×
- In re K.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-11· cited 14×
- In re G.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.