In re: J.C.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Merely placing an ‘X’ in the boxes of the form order has been disapproved repeatedly[.]” (citation and some quotation marks omitted)
• “Merely placing an ‘X’ in the boxes of the form order has been disapproved repeatedly[.]” (citation and some quotation marks omitted)
• “The trial court announced at the conclusion of the hearing . . . it would incorporate by reference as findings in the order the report of Dr. Ijaz and offered by Ms. Motley.”
• “The trial court announced at the conclusion of the hearing . . . it would incorporate by reference as findings in the order the report of Dr. Ijaz and offered by Ms. Motley.”
• “Since respondent did not object to admission of the report, and she did not assert her right to have Dr. Ijaz appear to testify, the trial court did not err by admitting and considering the report.”
• “Since respondent did not object to admission of the report, and she did not assert her right to have Dr. Ijaz appear to testify, the trial court did not err by admitting and considering the report.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carolina Mulching Co, L.L.C. v. Raleigh Wilmington Investors II
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-07-07
• In re: C.D.G.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-07-20
• In re: A.S.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-11-02
• In re: B.S.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-11-15
• In re: E.B.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-12-20

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• In re: W.R.D.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-08-02· cited 21×