In Re JCC Holding Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the rule in Bershad precluded recovery in a minority squeeze out transaction
• holding that a plaintiff cannot state a disclosure claim by “quibbling with the substance of a banker’s opinion” or arguing that the opinion reaches the “wrong” conclusion on value
• holding that a plaintiff cannot state a disclosure claim by “quibbling with the substance of a banker’s opinion” or arguing that the opinion reaches the “wrong” conclusion on value
• finding that disclosures are not inaccurate simply because plaintiffs disagree with them
• dismissing disclosure claim where “[t]he plaintiffs’ only beef” was alleged “mistakes in subjective judgment, even though those judgments were disclosed”
• finding a fair disclosure where a “proxy statement was written in a manner that allowed a reasonably sophisticated investor to see the key judgments that [a party] made […].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).